Haskett v. Capital Land Services, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER OF CLARIFICATION entered: The court held a discovery hearing on March 20, 2015. At the hearing, the court denied Phillip David Haskett's motions to extend discovery and to extend the time for filing a response to the defendants summary ju dgment motion. (Docket Entry Nos. 20, 25). The court directed Haskett to file a response to the defendants motion by April 10, 2015, that addresses the defendants arguments on (1) limitations and (2) his claim for breach of the settlement agreement. The court issues this order to clarify that Haskett's response should also address the defendants arguments on (3) his tortious-interference claim. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
PHILLIP DAVID HASKETT,
Plaintiff,
VS.
CAPITAL LAND SERVICES, INC., a/k/a
CLS GROUP, et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CIVIL ACTION NO. G-14-279

ORDER OF CLARIFICATION
The court held a discovery hearing on March 20, 2015. At the hearing, the court denied
Phillip David Haskett’s motions to extend discovery and to extend the time for filing a response to
the defendants’ summary judgment motion. (Docket Entry Nos. 20, 25). The court directed Haskett
to file a response to the defendants’ motion by April 10, 2015, that addresses the defendants’
arguments on (1) limitations and (2) his claim for breach of the settlement agreement. The court
issues this order to clarify that Haskett’s response should also address the defendants’ arguments on
(3) his tortious-interference claim.
SIGNED on March 20, 2015, at Houston, Texas.

______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge