In Re: Maersk Tankers
Filing
272
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS granting 189 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 217 Report and Recommendations, It is hereby ORDERED that the counter-claims against Houston Pilots (Dkts. 147, 166) are hereby DISMISSED. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dperez, 3)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
GALVESTON DIVISION
IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE
COMPLAINT OF MAERSK TANKERS,
AS OWNER AND OPERATOR OF THE
M/T CARLA MAERSK, FOR
EXONERATION FROM OR
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, et al,
Plaintiffs,
VS.
HOUSTON PILOTS, et al,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
January 05, 2017
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-106
ORDER
Pending before the Court is Claimant Houston Pilots’ Motion for Summary
Judgment. Dkt. 189. Counter-claimants Maersk Tankers (“Maersk”) as well as Conti
168 Schiffarts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS and BBG-Bremer Bereederungsgesellschaft
mbH & Co. KG (“Conti”) responded to the motion (Dkts. 198 and 196, respectively).
Houston Pilots replied (Dkt. 205). On August 11, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge
John R. Froeschner entered a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”). The R & R
recommended granting Houston Pilots’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the
counter-claims brought by Maersk and Conti.
Neither Maersk nor Conti objected to the R & R, though they had the opportunity
to do so. Because the parties declined to object to the R & R, the Court ADOPTS its
findings and conclusions. Houston Pilots’ Motion for Summary Judgment is therefore
GRANTED.
1/2
It is hereby ORDERED that the counter-claims against Houston Pilots (Dkts. 147,
166) are hereby DISMISSED.
SIGNED at Galveston, Texas, this 5th day of January, 2017.
___________________________________
George C. Hanks Jr.
United States District Judge
2/2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?