Green v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 15 Report and Recommendations, Granting, 9 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief In Support (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(lusmith, 3)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION § § Plaintiff, § VS. § § WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, et § al, § § Defendants. § July 06, 2016 David J. Bradley, Clerk WENDY J. GREEN, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-241 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John Froeschner. On June 1, 2016, this case was referred to Judge Froeschner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Pending before Judge Froeschner was the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (Dkt. 9). On June 7, 2016, Judge Froeschner filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted. (Dkt. 15). No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). Based on the pleadings, the record and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: 1/2 (1) Judge Froeschner’s Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; (2) The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and (3) The case is DISMISSED, with prejudice. It is so ORDERED. SIGNED at Galveston, Texas, this 6th day of July, 2016. ___________________________________ George C. Hanks Jr. United States District Judge 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?