Salazar v. Social Security Administration et al
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CASE re: 22 Report and Recommendations,, Motions No Longer Referred, Granting 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(lusmith, 3)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ALMA ELIA SALAZAR,
ADMINISTRATION, et al,
March 23, 2017
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-40
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge John Froeschner. Dkt. 22. On July 12, 2016, this case was referred to
Judge Froeschner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Dkt. 13. Pending before Judge
Froeschner was Defendant’s (Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration) Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 12. On March 6, 2017,
Judge Froeschner filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that the
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that the Plaintiff’s action be
dismissed. Dkt. 22.
No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly,
the Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the
record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record and the applicable law, the Court finds that
there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
Judge Froeschner Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND
ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court;
The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED;
The case is DISMISSED;
All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.
It is so ORDERED.
SIGNED at Galveston, Texas, this 22nd day of March, 2017.
George C. Hanks Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?