Tammy Lynn Babcock, ex rel., et al v. Coastal health & Wellness, et al.
ORDER granting 23 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint, denying as moot 21 Opposed MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Partial) (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dperez, 3)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TAMMY LYNN BABCOCK, et al,
COASTAL HEALTH & WELLNESS, et
January 08, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-109
This is a suit under the False Claims Act, originally filed in April 2017. Dkt. 1.
Plaintiffs Tammy Babcock and Malek Bohsali, filed their Second Amended Complaint
on November 21, 2017.
That Second Amended Complaint states that it
“Plaintiffs aris[es] from Defendants’ fraudulent schemes in connection with obtaining
money through federal grants, and for retaliating against Relators in violation of 31
U.S.C. §§ 3730(h).”
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case, and a docket control order
issued, on December 8, 2017. Dkt. 20. On December 12, 2017, Defendants Coastal
Health & Wellness and Galveston County Health District filed their Opposed Motion to
Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, seeking a partial dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims.
Specifically, Defendants sought a dismissal of “Plaintiffs’ claims and factual allegations
that Defendants violated the False Claims Act.” Dkt. 21. Defendant’s motion for partial
dismissal clarified that they were “not seeking to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims for retaliation
based upon a “good faith belief that Defendants were committing fraud against the
United States.” Id.
After Defendants filed the motion for partial dismissal, Plaintiffs filed an
“Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint.” Dkt. 23.
considering the Plaintiffs’ motion, and noting that it is not opposed by Defendants, the
Court hereby GRANTS the motion to amend. The Clerk of the Court shall file the
Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A to the motion, among
the papers of this case.
Additionally, Defendants have now filed notice that they wish to withdraw their
motion for partial dismissal. Accordingly, the motion for partial dismissal (Dkt. 21) is
hereby DENIED as moot, without prejudice to refiling.
SIGNED at Galveston, Texas, this 8th day of January, 2018.
George C. Hanks Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?