Mitchell v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Filing
15
ORDER granting 11 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ltrevino, 3)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
GALVESTON DIVISION
SAMUEL MITCHELL,
TDCJ # 02043205,
June 07, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk
§
§
§
§
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-0122
§
§
§
§
Plaintiff,
VS.
LORIE DAVIS, et al,
Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff Samuel Mitchell is presently incarcerated in the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division (“TDCJ”) at the Powledge Unit. The
plaintiff has filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his civil
rights. Mitchell has filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 11).
Because Mitchell is incarcerated, this case is governed by the Prison Litigation Reform
Act (the “PLRA”), which requires impecunious prisoners to pay an initial partial filing
fee. The PLRA also requires prisoners to pay thereafter the balance of the full filing fee
of $350.
Based on the certified inmate trust account statement (Dkt. 14) supplied by the
plaintiff, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1.
The application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 11) is
GRANTED.
2.
The plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $23.00. The agency
having custody of the plaintiff shall collect this amount from the plaintiff’s inmate trust
1/4
fund account or institutional equivalent, when funds are available, and forward it to the
Clerk.
3.
Thereafter, the plaintiff shall pay $327.00, the balance of the filing fee, in
periodic installments as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The agency shall collect this
amount from the plaintiff’s trust account, when funds are available, and forward it to the
Clerk.
4.
The plaintiff is responsible for signing all consents and other documents
required by the agency having custody of plaintiff to authorize the necessary withdrawal
from the plaintiff’s inmate trust account.
5.
Failure to pay the initial partial filing fee or to show that the plaintiff has
insufficient assets or means by which to pay the initial partial filing fee within 30 days
may result in a dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint without further notice.
6.
Service of process will be withheld pending judicial screening pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
7.
No amendments or supplements to the complaint will be filed without prior
Court approval. A complete amended complaint will be attached to any motion to
amend. Any pleadings or other papers filed in violation of these directives, including any
pleadings or other papers which contain any new claims or any new factual allegations
not already explicitly raised in: (1) the original complaint, (2) any court approved
amendments or supplements to the original complaint, or (3) in response to an Order for
More Definite Statement, shall automatically be STRICKEN from the record without
further notice and will be of no force or effect in this lawsuit. Any pleadings or other
2/4
papers filed in violation of these directives in this paragraph may also subject the plaintiff
to other sanctions, including the dismissal of this suit for failure to comply with court
orders, if appropriate.
8.
All discovery in this case is stayed until the Court enters an order to
answer.
9.
No motions for appointment of counsel shall be considered until the Court
has completed its screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, which may or may not
include a hearing under Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985).
10.
The plaintiff must notify the court of any change of address by filing a
written notice of change of address with the Clerk. Failure to file such notice may result
in this case being dismissed for want of prosecution.
NOTICE TO THE PLAINTIFF
A.
Although you have been granted permission to proceed as a pauper, you
must pay the full filing fee when funds are available under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). If you
do not wish to pay the full filing fee you must notify the court in writing, by letter or
motion, advising that you do not wish to prosecute this civil action. Your notice must be
received by the Court within 30 days of the date of this order.
B.
Payment of all or any part of the full filing fee will not prevent dismissal of
the complaint if it is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. If
the case is dismissed on any of those grounds before payment of the entire filing fee, the
plaintiff must still pay the entire filing fee. When a prisoner has had three or more prior
3/4
actions or appeals dismissed for being frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted, federal law prohibits the prisoner from bringing any
more actions or appeals in forma pauperis unless the plaintiff is in imminent danger of
serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
C.
State law requires the forfeiture of good conduct time credits as a sanction
for any state or federal lawsuit brought by an inmate while in the custody of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice, or confined in county jail awaiting transfer to TDCJ, that
is dismissed as frivolous or malicious. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 498.0045. This
sanction extends to frivolous proceedings arising from an application for writ of habeas
corpus if brought for the purpose of abusing judicial resources. See id. § 498.0045(a).
The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the parties and will also provide a
copy of this order to (1) the TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel, Capitol Station,
P.O. Box 13084, Austin, Texas, 78711, Fax: 512-936-2159; and (2) the Inmate Trust
Fund, P.O. Box 629, Huntsville, Texas 77342-0629, Fax: 936-437-4793.
SIGNED at Galveston, Texas, this 7th day of June, 2018.
___________________________________
George C. Hanks Jr.
United States District Judge
4/4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?