Malbrough v Holmes et al
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 94 Memorandum and Recommendations, Denied 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 4)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JASON DEON HOLMES, et al.
April 27, 2021
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On February 23, 2021, all non-dispositive pretrial matters in this case were
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(A). Dkt. 78. On April 5, 2021, Judge Edison filed a memorandum and
recommendation (Dkt. 94) recommending that Defendant’s Traditional and No
Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 58) be
No objections have been filed to the memorandum and recommendation.
Accordingly, the court reviews it for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court finds that
there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly:
Judge Edison’s memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 94) is
approved and adopted in its entirety as the holding of the court; and
Defendant’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary
Judgment and Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 58) is denied.
Signed on Galveston Island this 27th day of April 2021.
JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?