Malbrough v Holmes et al

Filing 95

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 94 Memorandum and Recommendations, Denied 58 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge Jeffrey V Brown) Parties notified.(GeorgeCardenas, 4)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
GALVESTON DIVISION
NICOLE MALBROUGH,
VS.
JASON DEON HOLMES, et al.

April 27, 2021
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

§
§
§ 3:17-CV-00283
§
§

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On February 23, 2021, all non-dispositive pretrial matters in this case were
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison under 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(A). Dkt. 78. On April 5, 2021, Judge Edison filed a memorandum and
recommendation (Dkt. 94) recommending that Defendant’s Traditional and No
Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 58) be
denied.
No objections have been filed to the memorandum and recommendation.
Accordingly, the court reviews it for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court finds that
there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly:
(1)

Judge Edison’s memorandum and recommendation (Dkt. 94) is
approved and adopted in its entirety as the holding of the court; and

(2)

Defendant’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary
Judgment and Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 58) is denied.

Signed on Galveston Island this 27th day of April 2021.
___________________________
JEFFREY VINCENT BROWN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2