Jefferson v. Haza Foods

Filing 33

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 30 Memorandum and Recommendations. Defendant Haza Foods d/b/a Wendy's 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment is DENIED.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(dwilkerson, 3)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
GALVESTON DIVISION
CANIKA JEFFERSON
Plaintiff.
VS.
HAZA FOODS
Defendant.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

October 23, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17–CV–00359

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Pending before the Court is the Memorandum and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison. On September 20, 2018, this case was
referred to Judge Edison. Dkt. 27. Pending before Judge Edison was Defendant Haza
Foods d/b/a Wendy’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 19. On October 5, 2018,
Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending Defendant
Haza Foods d/b/a Wendy’s Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED. Dkt. 30.
No objections have been filed to the Memorandum and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error
on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that
there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1)

Judge Edison’s Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 30) be
APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court;
and

(2)

Defendant Haza Foods d/b/a Wendy’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Dkt. 19) be DENIED.

.
It is so ORDERED.
SIGNED at Galveston, Texas, this 23rd day of October, 2018.
___________________________________
George C. Hanks Jr.
United States District Judge

2