Reese v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID

Filing 41

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 38 MOTION Leave of Court to Correct Cause, 39 MOTION Rule 60 Motion (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(agould, 3)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION RODERICK L REESE, TDCJ # 01027930, Petitioner, VS. LORIE DAVIS, Respondent. May 02, 2019 David J. Bradley, Clerk § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-389 § APPEAL NO. 18-41185 § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this habeas corpus action, the Court granted summary judgment for Respondent and entered final judgment (Dkt. 31, Dkt. 32) on September 25, 2018. Petitioner filed a notice of appeal, which the appellate court dismissed as untimely on January 30, 2019 (Dkt. 37). Petitioner now has filed a motion seeking to correct the district court cause number on his notice of appeal. The appellate court’s order correctly refers to Civil Action No. 3:17-0389. Because Petitioner has not demonstrated a basis for the relief he seeks, his motion to correct a cause number (Dkt. 38) is DENIED. Petitioner also has filed a motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. See Lowry Dev., L.L.C. v. Groves & Associates Ins., Inc., 690 F.3d 382, 385 (5th Cir. 2012); Hesling v. CSX Transp., Inc., 396 F.3d 632, 642 (5th Cir. 2005) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). Petitioner’s arguments in the motion regarding clerical errors in his filings are irrelevant to, and provide no basis for relief 1/2 from, this Court’s order granting summary judgment for Respondent. Therefore, Petitioner’s motion under Rule 60 (Dkt. 39) is DENIED. The Clerk of this Court is instructed to send a copy of this order to the parties. SIGNED at Galveston, Texas, this 2nd day of May, 2019. ___________________________________ George C. Hanks Jr. United States District Judge 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?