Kish v. Rogers, et al

Filing 135

FINAL JUDGMENT entered in favor of the Government. Costs of court are taxed to Joseph Kish. Case terminated on 4/21/09.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

Download PDF
Kish v. Rogers, et al Doc. 135 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JOSEPH MICHAEL KISH, Plaintiff, VS. DAVID A. ROGERS, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-2389 FINAL JUDGMENT On October 22, 2007, this court granted the United States's Motion for Summary Judgment against Joseph Michael Kish, establishing Kish's federal income tax liabilities for the 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 tax years, plus interest and penalties. This court also entered orders appointing a receiver and ordering the sale of Kish's royalty interest and of certain stock held by Kish and his wife, Jan Kish. Kish's royalty interest and interest in those stocks has been sold. Jan Kish received her portion of the proceeds and the remainder was applied to Kish's outstanding tax liabilities. The United States is entitled to judgment against Joseph Michael Kish on its claim for the form 1040 federal income taxes, and penalties assessed against him for 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 tax years, in the aggregate amounts of $93,469.40, $13,925.41, $12,031.94, and $7,045.15, respectively, as of April 8, 2009, plus interest and other additions to tax allowed by law accruing thereafter under 26 U.S.C. 6601, 6621, and 28 U.S.C. 1961 until paid. Costs of court are taxed to Joseph Michael Kish. SIGNED on April 21, 2009, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?