Thomas v. Astrue

Filing 23

ORDER entered ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 22 Memorandum and Recommendations, 19 Unopposed MOTION for Summary Judgment, 13 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment. This case is remanded to permit further developement of the record.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

Download PDF
Thomas v. Astrue Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CAROLYN THOMAS o/b/o C.T., a minor, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-07-2043 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDERING REMAND This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on August 20, 2008, and has made a de novo determination of the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). No objections have been filed. This court finds that the Memorandum and Recommendation should be, and is, adopted as this court's Memorandum and Order. This court finds that the Administrative Law Judge's decision to deny disability benefits to Thomas was not supported by substantial evidence and is not made in accordance with the applicable law. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted; the defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied; and the plaintiff's claim for Supplemental Security Income benefits is remanded to permit further Dockets.Justia.com development of the record on the severity of C.T.'s asthma and its effect viewed in combination with his ADHD and Tourette's syndrome. This case is remanded to the Social Security Commission for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, adopted as the Memorandum and Opinion of this court. SIGNED on September 16, 2008, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?