TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC. v. Stena Drilling Limited et al

Filing 52

ORDER entered STAYING CASE and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE. The scheduling order entered on 6/6/11 is vacated. Within 14 days of the issuance of a mandate in the appeal, Transocean must file any request to reinstate.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC., Plaintiff, v. STENA DRILLING LIMITED, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-08-3287 ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE Defendants Stena Drilling Limited, Stena DrillMax Limited, Stena DrillMax I Limited, Stena DrillMax I (Hungary) Kft, and Stena DrillMax III Limited (collectively, “the Stena Defendants”) have jointly moved for an administrative stay of the above-captioned case pending the appeal in Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. Maersk Contractors USA, Inc., No. H-07-02392 (S.D. Tex.) (“the appeal”). Plaintiff Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. opposed the stay. The court finds that the issues in the Maersk case and this case are closely interrelated, making it both difficult and inefficient for this court and the parties to proceed with this case while the Maersk appeal is pending. This court also finds that there is no business or commercial reason weighing against a stay while the appeal in the Maersk case is decided. Accordingly, this case is stayed and administratively closed pending the Maersk appeal. Within 14 days of the issuance of a mandate in the appeal, Transocean must file any request to reinstate the above-captioned case. The Scheduling Order (Docket Entry No. 48) entered June 6, 2011, is vacated. SIGNED on September 22, 2011, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?