Adams Offshore Limited v. OSA International, LLC et al

Filing 85

ORDER entered: Pending before this court is the summary-judgment defendants motion to withdraw deemed admissions. (Docket Entry No. 81). Adams Offshore Limited has not yet responded to that motion. The parties have informed the court that they hav e reached a tentative settlement. To accommodate the parties, Adams Offshore is granted an extension for filing its response. In the event that the parties do not settle, Adams Offshores response is due by 5:00 p.m. Central on October 24, 2011.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
ADAMS OFFSHORE LIMITED,
Plaintiff,
v.
OSA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-0465

ORDER
Pending before this court is the summary-judgment defendants’ motion to withdraw deemed
admissions.1 (Docket Entry No. 81). Adams Offshore Limited has not yet responded to that motion.
The parties have informed the court that they have reached a tentative settlement. To accommodate
the parties, Adams Offshore is granted an extension for filing its response. In the event that the
parties do not settle, Adams Offshore’s response is due by 5:00 p.m. Central on October 24, 2011.
SIGNED on October 18, 2011, at Houston, Texas.

______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge

1

The summary-judgment defendants are OSA International, LLC; Con-Dive, LLC; Amado Omar Yanez Osuna;
Oceanografia, S.A. de C.V.; Mindy Kay a/k/a Mindy K. McGilvrey; and Gustavo Adolfo Azcarate Padilla. (Docket
Entry No. 84, at 1).