Amin et al v. Hudson et al
Filing
17
ORDER entered GRANTING 16 MOTION to Dismiss 1 Petition/Complaint for Writ of Mandamus for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss 1 Petition/Complaint for Writ of Mandamus for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction MOTION to Dismiss 1 Petition/Complaint for Writ of Mandamus for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Case terminated on 9/24/09.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION NINA AMIN, MUHAMMAD AMIN and ABU TURAB AMIN Plaintiffs, v. SANDRA M. HEATHMAN, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, District Director, Houston Field Office, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § §
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-09-0791
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS The plaintiffs, Nina Amin, Muhammad Amin, and Abu Turab Amin, filed this suit in August 2009, seeking a writ of mandamus to compel immediate adjudication of their I-485 applications for adjustment of status and their I-131 applications for travel authorizations. The defendants moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Docket Entry No. 16). The defendants submitted evidence showing that the applications were all adjudicated. The I-131 applications were previously approved and the I-485 applications were denied on August 20, 2009, which revoked the travel authorization documents. (Id., Declaration of Genize X. Walker, Supervisory Immigration Services Officer, Texas Service Center, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security). As a result, the complaint of unlawful delay in adjudication and application for a writ of mandamus to compel adjudication are moot. The motion to dismiss for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted. This case is dismissed.
SIGNED on September 24, 2009, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?