AMALGAMATED BANK et al v. HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.

Filing 24

ORDER entered: The Financial Institution plaintiffs stipulated to the dismissal of their claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as set forth in Counts VIII and X of the Amended Complaint (Docket Entry No. 32), in the actio ns Amalgamated Bank et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02026, and PBC Credit Union et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02105. Based on the stipulated dismissal of the sole remaining claim, these cases are dismissed, with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
In Re: Heartland Payment
§
Systems, Inc. Customer Data
§
Security Breach Litigation
§
______________________________________ §
§
This filing relates to:
§
§
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TRACK
§
ACTIONS
§

Civil Action No. H-09-MD-2046

ORDER
The Financial Institution plaintiffs stipulated to the dismissal of their claims under the
Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as set forth in Counts VIII and X of the Amended
Complaint (Docket Entry No. 32), in the actions Amalgamated Bank et al. v. Heartland Payment
Systems, Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02026, and PBC Credit Union et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems,
Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02105. Based on the stipulated dismissal of the sole remaining claim, these
cases are dismissed, with prejudice.
Each party must bear its own costs.
SIGNED on September 30, 2012, at Houston, Texas.

______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge