Mark Hilliard v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 3/31/2009 approving 8 Stipulation extending time for Defendant to respond to complaint and staying proceedings pending transfer by Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MARK HILLIARD, individually and CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00219-OWWon behalf of all others similarly DLB 12 situated, 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ FRESNO DIVISION 15 HEARTLAND PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation Extending Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint and Staying Proceedings Pending Transfer by the Judicial Panel on 22 Multidistrict Litigation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendant Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint is hereby 26 adjourned in light of Heartland's motion before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict 27 Litigation to transfer this matter for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 and, if the motion to transfer is granted, until such time 2 3 4 5 6 DATED: 3/31/2009 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com as set by the transferee court. IT IS SO ORDERED. By: __/s/ OLIVER W. WANGER______________ Hon. Oliver W. Wanger, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?