PBC Credit Union et al v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER entered: The Financial Institution plaintiffs stipulated to the dismissal of their claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as set forth in Counts VIII and X of the Amended Complaint (Docket Entry No. 32), in the actio ns Amalgamated Bank et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02026, and PBC Credit Union et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02105. Based on the stipulated dismissal of the sole remaining claim, these cases are dismissed, with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In Re: Heartland Payment § Systems, Inc. Customer Data § Security Breach Litigation § ______________________________________ § § This filing relates to: § § FINANCIAL INSTITUTION TRACK § ACTIONS § Civil Action No. H-09-MD-2046 ORDER The Financial Institution plaintiffs stipulated to the dismissal of their claims under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, as set forth in Counts VIII and X of the Amended Complaint (Docket Entry No. 32), in the actions Amalgamated Bank et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02026, and PBC Credit Union et al. v. Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., Case No. 4:09-cv-02105. Based on the stipulated dismissal of the sole remaining claim, these cases are dismissed, with prejudice. Each party must bear its own costs. SIGNED on September 30, 2012, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?