House vs. Interline Brands, Inc.

Filing 52

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENIED 50 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.(Signed by Judge Nancy F. Atlas) Parties notified.(sashabranner, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TRACETTE D. HOUSE, Plaintiff, v. INTERLINE BRANDS, INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-0183 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Tracette D. House’s Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (“IFP Motion”) [Doc. # 50]. An IFP Motion for purposes of appeal must state “the nature of the action, defense or appeal and affiant’s belief that he is entitled to redress.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The district court may deny leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis if the appeal is not taken in good faith. Cay v. Estelle, 789 F.2d 318, 326 (5th Cir. 1986). An appeal is taken in good faith if it presents an arguable issue on the merits and therefore is not frivolous. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962); Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219 (5th Cir. 1983). The movant is required to demonstrate the existence of a non-frivolous issue for appeal. See Payne v. Lynaugh, 843 F.2d 177, 178 (5th Cir. 1988). In this case, Plaintiff states in her Notice of Appeal that the Court erred “because the order was based on fraud, scheme to defraud with intent by the P:\ORDERS\11-2010\0183MAppealIFP.wpd 110728.1204 Defendants.” See Notice of Appeal [Doc. # 46], p. 2. Plaintiff also asserts that the “decision was against great weight of evidence in that no evidence to establish probable cause to believe Plaintiff has no evidence.” See id. Finally, Plaintiff asserts that “there was no evidence to justify a reasonable suspicion or probable cause to terminate case and Defendants failed to lay proper predicate for introduction of evidence of Plaintiff.” See id. These assertions fail to identify a non-frivolous issue for the appeal. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s IFP Motion [Doc. # 50] is DENIED. SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this 28th day of July, 2011. P:\ORDERS\11-2010\0183MAppealIFP.wpd 110728.1204 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?