Terry, et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
Filing
97
FINAL JUDGMENT entered: The Terrys take nothing on the prompt-payment claims, unfair settlement practices claims, and extracontractual claims, and Safeco Insurance is discharged from liability to Jack Terry and Eden Terry for all claims that were pleaded or could have been pleaded in this case. The parties will bear their own costs of court. This is a final judgment. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
JACK TERRY and EDEN TERRY,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF
AMERICA,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-0340
FINAL JUDGMENT
On March 7, 2013, following a jury trial, the court entered partial judgment in favor of Jack
Terry and Eden Terry against defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America for their contractual
claims, plus prejudgment and judgment interest. The parties have advised the court that Safeco
Insurance has paid Jack Terry and Eden Terry all the amounts awarded in the partial judgment. On
March 7, 2013 and September 17, 2013, the court granted the motions for summary judgment filed
by Safeco Insurance and dismissed the Terrys’ prompt-payment claims, unfair settlement practices
claims, and extracontractual claims, with prejudice. (Docket Entry Nos. 89, 95). The Terrys take
nothing on the prompt-payment claims, unfair settlement practices claims, and extracontractual
claims, and Safeco Insurance is discharged from liability to Jack Terry and Eden Terry for all claims
that were pleaded or could have been pleaded in this case. The parties will bear their own costs of
court. This is a final judgment.
SIGNED on September 25, 2013, at Houston, Texas.
______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?