Graham v. Astrue
Filing
16
OPINION on Summary Judgment. The administration's decision denying Graham's claim for disability insurance benefits is supported by substantial evidence and will be affirmed. Cornell Graham will take nothing from Michael Astrue.(Signed by Judge Lynn N. Hughes) Parties notified.(chorace)
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Cornell R. Graham,
Plaintiff,
%ersus
Michael J. Astrue
Defendant.
Civil Action H-4:10.c~-01013
Opinion on SummaryJudgment
I.
Introduction.
T h e question is whether substantial evidence supports the administration's decision
that Cornell Graham is not disabled under the Social Security Act. ?-he evidence does support
the administration's decision.
2.
Standard of review.
Graham brought this action forjudicial review of the administration's decision to deny
him disability insurance benefits. Judicial review is limited to determining if there is substantial
evidence in the record to support the administration's decision.' This is a level of proof that a
reasonable mind would accept as sufficient to support a conclusion.'
3.
Statutory criteria.
T h e law uses a five-step evaluation process to determine whether a person is disabled.
First, a person is not disabled if he can do substantial gainful activity. Second, a person is not
' Anthony v. Sullivan, 954
F.2d 289, 292 (5th Cir. 1
~ ~ 2 )
Spcllman T . Shalala, I F.3d 357, 360 (5th Cir. 1 9 ~ 3 ) .
disabled unless he has been physically or mentally impaired for at least twelve months. Third,
a person is not disabled unless his impairment meets one listed in appendix I of the regulation.
Fourth, a person is not disabled if he can perform his past work. Fifth, a person is not disabled
if he can make an adjustment to other work.:
4.
Ezidencc.
A.
Background.
Graham is a 56-year-oldman who says that he is physically disabled by bladder cancer
in remission, high blood pressure, diabetes, insomnia, and incontinence. He says these
conditions affect his ability to see, walk, and stand for long periods.
Graham has a high-school education. He has worked as a mechanist, truck driver, and
trucking business manager. M/hen he applied for social security on October 17, 2008, he said
his disability began in August of 2007.
T h e hearing officer found that Graham's disability did not meet a listed impairment. He
decided that Graham could perform his past work as a manager that required a medium level
of exertion.
B.
Application.
T h e administration properly found that Graham was not disabled. T h e five-step
evaluation process was used. First, Graham has not performed substantial gainful activity.
Second, he has been physically impaired for more than twelve months. T h e administration
found that Graham's diabetes, hypertension, fatigue, bladder cancer in remission, insomnia, and
obesity were severe impairments. Third, while his impairments are severe, they do not meet the
requirements of any listed impairment. Fourth, the administration correctly found that Graham
would be able to perform his past work because it determined his medical conditions can be
remedied by either surgery, treatment, or medication, and because the examiner reported that
Graham was asymptomatic and did not suffer from disabling pain. Fifth, Graham concedes that
he is capable of lifting up to thirty pounds, can walk about one-half of a mile, and can drive
suggesting he can adjust to other forms of work.
T o determine whether Graham was disabled, the administration evaluated his medical
records, fatigue from medication, and residual functional-capacity assessment. He says that he
3 20
C.F.R. kj 416.920(a)(~)(iii) (2012)
is unable to work because he is in disabling pain; however, he is capable of taking care of his
personal needs, riding a bike, shopping for clothing, and doing laundry. He also testified that
he helps take care of his aunt and uncle regularly. T h e evidence supports the administration's
decision that Graham's impairments are not disabling and that he is capable of performing his
past work.
5.
Conclusion.
T h e administration's decision denying Graham's claim for disability insurance benefits
is supported by substantial evidence and will be affirmed. Cornell Graham will take nothing
from Michael Astrue.
Signed on June
4
, 201 2 , at Houston, Texas.
Lynn N. Hughes
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?