Novack v. City of Webster Tx et al
Filing
11
ORDER entered DENYING 8 MOTION to Dismiss. In response to the defendants motion to dismiss filed under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, (Docket Entry No. 8), the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The motion to dismiss is denied, without prejudice. It may be reurged, as appropriate, based on the amended complaint. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
<![CDATA[
Novack v. City of Webster Tx et al
Doc. 11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TOM NOVACK, Plaintiff, VS. CITY OF WEBSTER, TEXAS, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § §
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-2594
ORDER In response to the defendants' motion to dismiss filed under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, (Docket Entry No. 8), the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The motion to dismiss is denied, without prejudice. It may be reurged, as appropriate, based on the amended complaint.
SIGNED on October 13, 2010, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
