Jones v. The United States Postal Service

Filing 89

ORDER entered DENYING 84 MOTION for Judgment, DENYING 87 MOTION for Judgment, DENYING 88 MOTION for Continuance, DENYING 86 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
FELICIA N. JONES,

§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
VS.
§
§
THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, §
§
Defendant.
§

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-566

ORDER
Felicia Jones’s second motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, (Docket Entry No.
86), is denied for the reasons stated in this court’s Order entered on July 19, 2012. (See Docket
Entry No. 83.) The two motions for judgment as a matter of law, (Docket Entries No. 84 & 87), and
the motion for a continuance, (Docket Entry No. 88), are denied because they are frivolous and
because they raise issues already ruled on by this court.
SIGNED on August 13, 2012, at Houston, Texas.

______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge