Lucas v. NOYPI, Inc. et al
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 31 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(chorace)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
MAX LUCAS, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated,
§
§
§
§
§
Plaintiffs,
§
v.
§
§
NOYPI, INC.; PIONEER CONTRACT
SERVICES, INC.; SUSAN SUSUSCO;
and ED FRITCHER,
§
§
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-1940
§
§
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending before the court is Defendants'
Judgment and Memorandum of Authorities
Summary
Judgment")
discussed below,
(Docket
Entry
No.
Motion for Summary
("Defendants'
31).
For
Motion for
the
reasons
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment will be
granted.
I.
A.
Factual and Procedural Background
Defendants' Businesses and Plaintiffs' Employment
During
the
("NOYPI")
was
retained
by
in
time
the
relevant
to
this
lawsuit,
commercial moving business,
customers
to
move
property
NOYPI,
i. e. ,
between
Inc.
it was
locations. 1
lDefendants' Appendix to Its Motion for Summary Judgment and
Memorandum of Authorities ("Defendants' Appendix"), Docket Entry
No. 32, Ex. 1, Declaration of Raul Sususco, p. 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?