In re: BP America Inc.
Filing
10
ORDER entered DENYING 5 MOTION for Reconsideration of 4 Memorandum and Order.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
In re:
BP AMERICA, INC.
§
§
§
§
§
MISC. ACTION NO. H-11-0543
ORDER
This court previously granted BP America, Inc.’s motion to quash the deposition of Robert
Malone. (Docket Entry No. 4). The plaintiff, Andrew Vargas, has moved for reconsideration of this
court’s order. (Docket Entry No. 5). BP has responded. (Docket Entry No. 6).
A motion to reconsider is appropriately considered under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
59(e), which allows for “[a] motion to alter or amend a judgment [that is] filed no later than 28 days
after the entry of the judgment.” Relief under this rule is difficult to obtain. As the Fifth Circuit
explains:
A Rule 59(e) motion—which asks the court to set aside its previous
judgment—“serves the narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct
manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered
evidence. Reconsideration of a judgment after its entry is an
extraordinary remedy that should be used sparingly.”
Ewans v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 389 F. App’x 383, 389–90 (5th Cir. 2010) (quoting Templet v.
HydroChem Inc., 367 F.3d 473, 479 (5th Cir. 2004)); accord 11 CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT, ET AL.,
FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE § 2810.1, at 124–26 (2d ed. 1995). Such a motion “cannot be
used to raise arguments which could, and should, have been made before the judgment issued” or
“to argue a case under a new legal theory.” Ross v. Marshall, 426 F.3d 745, 763 (5th Cir. 2005).
Having carefully considered Vargas’s arguments in support of reconsideration, this court
concludes that Vargas has failed to demonstrate any manifest errors of law or fact in the court’s
previous opinion. For that reason, and for the reasons stated in the court’s previous memorandum
and opinion, Vargas’s motion for reconsideration, (Docket Entry No. 5), is denied.
SIGNED on January 19, 2012, at Houston, Texas.
______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?