Noonan v. Bank of America Corporation et a
Filing
3
ORDER OF REMAND. This case is REMANDED to the 234th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. Case terminated on October 12, 2012(Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(chorace)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
PETER NOONAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,
et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.4: 12 - 3
05l
§
ORDER OF REMAND
Pending is an unverified application for Temporary Restraining
Order
Oddly,
state
(TRO)
by pro se Plaintiff Peter Noonan
(Document No.1).
Plaintiff alleges that he is removing his own case from
court,
where
assertion that
he
on
his
is complete diversity of citizenship.
there
filed
it
March
5,
2012,
based
A
plaintiff may not remove his own case to federal court.
U.S.C.
§
court
of
original
Title 28
1441 states that "any civil action brought in a State
which the
district
jurisdiction,
may be
courts
of
removed
the United States have
by the defendant or the
defendants,
to the district court of the United States .
28 U.S.C.
1441(a); see also Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets,
§
61 S. Ct. 868, 872
Supp.
147,
149
(1941); Scott v. Commc'ns Serv.,
(S.D.
Tex.
1991),
aff'd 961
F.2d 1571
1992) ("Only the defendant can remove a case.").
case must be remanded to state court.
Inc.,
II
762 F.
(5th Cir.
Accordingly, this
It is therefore
ORDERED that
this case is REMANDED to the 234th Judicial
District Court of Harris County, Texas.
The Clerk will mail a certified copy of this Order to the
Clerk of the 234th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas,
as required by 28 U.S.C.
§
1447, and shall notify all parties and
provide them with a true copy of this Order.
SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this
~ of
October, 2012.
WERLEIN, JR.
TES DISTRICT JUDGE
~
•
2
- -
--- -- -- - ---------------------
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?