Wesolek v. Layton
Filing
18
FINAL JUDGMENT. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Case terminated on 12/21/2012. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
JOHN S. WESOLEK, DEBORAH J.
§
WESOLEK, JOEL T. JOHNSON,
§
RANDY LINSTEDT, DOUGLAS A.
§
CARSON, DR. ENRIQUE REYES-B,
§
MARIA GEORGINA REYES, LEV1
§
LINDEMANN, STEPHANIE LINDEMANN, §
MICHAEL P. WAGNER, DANIEL
§
MILLER, KRISTINA MILLER,
§
ROEL TREVINO, TIM PETERSON,
5
JANICE LAU, MIKE TASZAREK,
§
E. BRENT LUNDGREN, GLORIA
§
GACKLE, PETE HILL, KELCEY HILL, §
KEN ULLMANN, DALE SCHNEIDER,
§
DEBORAH SCHNEIDER, JOHN
§
MCINTOSH, MARGARET MCINTOSH,
§
MERYL A. WILLERT, JR., JULIE
§
WILLERT, TYLER ROEHL, PAMELA G. §
KLOOS, JEFFERY T. KLOOS, JUDY
§
KVAALE, CLIFF LARSON, JUDY
§
DVORAZK, MONA THORSTAD, ARLYN
§
LAND, STEVE JOHNSON, LORI
§
JOHNSON, JANET SKINNER, and
§
GEORGE SLIGHT, JERRY TALBERT, §
JASON GION, VICKIE GION, MARY
§
OHLHAUSER, RANDY OHLHAUSER,
§
TIM HOLLAND, RICK ERICKSON,
§
PAUL QUINNILD, CAROL QUINNILD, §
MARK FOLAND, KAREN FOLAND,
5
DEVIN LUBINUS, BRENT LARSON,
§
SANDRA UELAND, JOE HENJUM,
§
GARY HEARNEN, DON HEARDEN,
§
RANAIE BALL, BRIAN TJERLUND,
§
MIKE TASZARCK, RON BIUR, DAVE
§
PAULSON, BRUSE KUSLER, MIKE
§
HOLMGREN, and GUSTAV KOPRIVA,
§
Individually and Derivatively, §
on Behalf of LAYTON ENERGY
§
WHARTON FUND, LP and LAYTON
§
ENERGY FUND 2, LP,
§
Plaintiffs,
§
§
v.
DANIEL
LAYTON
LAYTON
ENERGY
LAYTON
§
§
LAYTON, J. CLARK LEGLER,
ENERGY TEXAS, LLC,
CORPORATION, LAYTON
WHARTON FUND, LP, and
ENERGY FUND 2, LP,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-12-3210
FINAL J[JDGMENT
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order granting
defendantsf motion to dismiss and denying plaintiff's request for
leave to replead, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Costs will be taxed against plaintiffs.
This is a FINAL JUDGMENT.
SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this 21st day of December, 2012.
SIM LAKE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?