Gonzalez v. Astrue
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered GRANTING 15 MOTION for Attorney Fees.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
CARLOS A. GONZALEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-12-3297
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
The plaintiff, Carlos Gonzalez, has moved for attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). (Docket Entry No. 15). Gonzalez prevailed in this court,
which reversed the Commissioner’s decision. The Commissioner does not dispute that a fee award
under EAJA is appropriate. Gonzalez seeks a fee award of $6,784.73 for 37.40 hours of legal
services, paid directly to the attorney, William C. Herren. The Commissioner disputes only one
aspect of the fees sought— the 6.95 hours incurred in compiling and summarizing the attorney time
spent and preparing the EAJA fee application. The Commissioner asserts that 1.5 hours is sufficient,
because the work efficiently copied much of the language and format of prior similar applications,
and because most of the work is clerical in nature. (Docket Entry No. 16).
The court agrees that 6.75 hours for the preparation of the short summary and the supporting
motion and affidavit is excessive. The court finds, however, that 3 hours is an appropriate amount
of time, recognizing that checking and verifying the information set out before attesting to it in an
affidavit is properly included in the time.
The revised fee award is based on 33.65 hours times $181.41 per hour. The total awarded
is $6,104.44. The court orders that this sum be paid to William C. Herren, counsel for Carlos
Gonzalez.
SIGNED on August 18, 2014, at Houston, Texas.
______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?