Vackar v. Sentry Supply Inc
Filing
57
FINAL JUDGMENT entered. Based on the courts Memoranda and Opinions issued on July 8, 2013, January 2, 2014, and November 7, 2014, the claims brought by Michael Vackar are dismissed with prejudice, and he takes nothing on those claims; Superior recove rs actual and exemplary damages on its counterclaims for fraud, money had and received, and defamation, in the amounts of $925.24 for actual damages on the fraud and money had and received claims, $1,500 for exemplary damages on the fraud c laim, and $10,800 on the defamation claim; and Superior recovers sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, in the amount of $5,000. Case terminated on 11/7/14(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
MICHAEL VACKAR,
Plaintiff,
VS.
SENTRY SUPPLY INC., d/b/a SUPERIOR
SUPPLY & STEEL
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-12-3716
FINAL JUDGMENT
Based on the court’s Memoranda and Opinions issued on July 8, 2013, January 2, 2014, and
November 7, 2014, the claims brought by Michael Vackar are dismissed with prejudice, and he takes
nothing on those claims; Superior recovers actual and exemplary damages on its counterclaims for
fraud, money had and received, and defamation, in the amounts of $925.24 for actual damages on
the fraud and money had and received claims, $1,500 for exemplary damages on the fraud claim,
and $10,800 on the defamation claim; and Superior recovers sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, in the amount of
$5,000.
This is a final judgment.
SIGNED on November 7, 2014, at Houston, Texas.
______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?