Burditt v. Leedy et al

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 29 Memorandum and Recommendations, denying 16 MOTION For the Court to Take Judicial Notice of Facts Supporting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, denying 26 MOTION to Stay, denying 11 Supplemental MOTION to Dismiss 7 MOTION to Dismiss, denying 7 MOTION to Dismiss, denying 12 MOTION for More Definite Statement. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION DARRELL BURDITT, § § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, v. JUDGE DANIEL LEEDY, In His Individual Capacity, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1070 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed Recommendation thereto the 1 dated court the May is of Magistrate Judge's 28 1 2014, and the the opinion that Memorandum objections and filed the Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this court. is It therefore ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED by this court. Plaintiff Darrell Burditt s l Motion to Correct Heading or Style of This Case With Respect to Court's Jurisdiction Entry No. 18) i (Docket Motion for the Court to Obey and Adhere to the Supreme Court Decisions of Connecticut Nat. Bank 503 U. S. 249 (1992) 491 U.S. 358 (1989) and New Orleans Public Service, (Docket Entry No. 20) i and Inc. Plaintiff's 350, Supplemental Information for the Court to Determine the Merits of the Motion for Resignation fo [sic] Judge S[]im Lake (Docket Entry No. 28) are DENIED. The Clerk shall send copies of this Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation to the respective parties. SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this the 12th day of June, 2014. S1M LAKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2- ----- . -------

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?