Burditt v. Leedy et al
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 29 Memorandum and Recommendations, denying 16 MOTION For the Court to Take Judicial Notice of Facts Supporting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, denying 26 MOTION to Stay, denying 11 Supplemental MOTION to Dismiss 7 MOTION to Dismiss, denying 7 MOTION to Dismiss, denying 12 MOTION for More Definite Statement. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (aboyd, 4)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
DARRELL BURDITT,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Plaintiff,
v.
JUDGE DANIEL LEEDY, In His
Individual Capacity, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1070
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Having
reviewed
Recommendation
thereto
the
1
dated
court
the
May
is of
Magistrate
Judge's
28 1
2014,
and
the
the
opinion that
Memorandum
objections
and
filed
the Memorandum and
Recommendation should be adopted by this court.
is
It
therefore
ORDERED
that
the
Memorandum
and
Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED by this court.
Plaintiff Darrell Burditt s
l
Motion to Correct Heading or
Style of This Case With Respect to Court's Jurisdiction
Entry No.
18)
i
(Docket
Motion for the Court to Obey and Adhere to the
Supreme Court Decisions of Connecticut Nat.
Bank 503 U. S.
249
(1992)
491 U.S.
358
(1989)
and New Orleans Public Service,
(Docket
Entry
No.
20)
i
and
Inc.
Plaintiff's
350,
Supplemental
Information for the Court to Determine the Merits of the Motion for
Resignation fo
[sic]
Judge S[]im Lake
(Docket Entry No.
28)
are
DENIED.
The Clerk shall send copies of this Order Adopting Magistrate
Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation to the respective parties.
SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on this the 12th day of June, 2014.
S1M LAKE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
-----
.
-------
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?