Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Pacific Drilling SA et al
Filing
103
ORDER entered GRANTING 101 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Pacific's Summary Judgment Motions (Dkt Nos. 87, 89, 86, and 91) and Motion to Exclude Testimony of Expert (Dkt. No. 88). Responses are due by December 23, 2015. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER §
DRILLING, INC.,
§
§
Plaintiff,
§
§
VS.
§
§
PACIFIC DRILLING SA, et al.,
§
§
Defendants.
§
December 07, 2015
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1088
ORDER
Transocean filed an opposed motion to extend its deadline to respond to the following Pacific
motions: the motion for partial summary judgment of no infringement based on no sale or offer to
sell, (Docket Entry No. 87); the motion for partial summary judgment of no infringement based on
no use or import, (Docket Entry No. 89); the motion for partial summary judgment of invalidity
based on anticipation, (Docket Entry No. 86); the motion for partial summary judgment of no willful
infringement, (Docket Entry No. 91); and the motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Cooke, (Docket
Entry No. 88). The motion for extension is granted. (Docket Entry No. 101). The deadline for
Transocean to respond to these motions is extended from December 10 to December 23, 2015.
SIGNED on December 7, 2015, at Houston, Texas.
______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?