Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Pacific Drilling SA et al

Filing 103

ORDER entered GRANTING 101 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Pacific's Summary Judgment Motions (Dkt Nos. 87, 89, 86, and 91) and Motion to Exclude Testimony of Expert (Dkt. No. 88). Responses are due by December 23, 2015. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER § DRILLING, INC., § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § § PACIFIC DRILLING SA, et al., § § Defendants. § December 07, 2015 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1088 ORDER Transocean filed an opposed motion to extend its deadline to respond to the following Pacific motions: the motion for partial summary judgment of no infringement based on no sale or offer to sell, (Docket Entry No. 87); the motion for partial summary judgment of no infringement based on no use or import, (Docket Entry No. 89); the motion for partial summary judgment of invalidity based on anticipation, (Docket Entry No. 86); the motion for partial summary judgment of no willful infringement, (Docket Entry No. 91); and the motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Cooke, (Docket Entry No. 88). The motion for extension is granted. (Docket Entry No. 101). The deadline for Transocean to respond to these motions is extended from December 10 to December 23, 2015. SIGNED on December 7, 2015, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?