Kaiser v. MetLife Home Loans

Filing 13

OPINION AND ORDER granting 7 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Melinda Harmon) Parties notified.(rhawkins, 4)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHER DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TRACY KAISER, § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, VS. METLIFE HOME LOANS, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION H-13-1186 OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause seeking to halt a scheduled foreclosure and to quiet tit on her property at 3214 Boxelder Drive, Houston, Texas 77082, are Defendant Metlife Home Loans' motion for summary judgment (instrument #7) and United States Magistrate Judge Frances Stacy's memorandum recommendation (#12) that the motion be granted. and intiff Tracy Kaiser failed to respond to the motion for summary judgment and has filed no objections to the Magistrate Judge's memorandum and memorandum and recommendation. Standard of Review Findings of the Magistrate Judge in a recommendation to which no specific objections are made require the Court only to decide whether the memorandum and recommendation is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 864 F.2d 1219, accept, 1221 Cir. reject, or modify, recommendations made by Id., citing U.S. v. Wilson, 1989). in whole or the magistrate The district part, judge." the court "may ndings or 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (C). The Court, having reviewed t memorandum and recommendation, briefs, the Magistrate Judge's and the applicable law, finds the Magistrate has correctly summarized the law and applied it to the facts in this action. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's memorandum and recommendation as s own and ORDERS that the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Final judgment will issue by separate order. SIGNED at Houston, Texas, this ~q J<., day of May, 2014. MELINDA HARMON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?