Keough v. ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER entered GRANTING 32 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer and/or Otherwise Plead to Plaintiff's Original Complaint. Answer due by 8/5/2013. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
TIMOTHY JOHN KEOUGH,
Plaintiff,
VS.
EXPRESS JET AIRLINES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-1343

ORDER
On June 4, 2013, defendant ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. filed a motion for enlargement of time
to file an answer. (Docket Entry No. 20). On June 5, this court granted ExpressJet an additional 30
days, through July 8, 2013, to answer. (Docket Entry No. 24). On June 28, defendant Air Line
Pilots Association International (“ALPA”) filed an unopposed motion for an extension of time to
answer or otherwise respond to the plaintiff’s complaint. (Docket Entry No. 31). On July 2, this
court granted ALPA’s motion and extended the deadline to August 5, 2013. (Docket Entry No. 39).
On July 1, ExpressJet moved to extend its deadline to match ALPA’s new deadline. (Docket Entry
No. 32). The plaintiff is opposed. (Docket Entry No. 33). Because the record reveals no unfairness
or prejudice in allowing the extension, ExpressJet’s motion is granted. ExpressJet has up to and
including August 5, 2013 to respond to the complaint.

SIGNED on July 8, 2013, at Houston, Texas.

______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge