Campos et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C.
Filing
8
ORDER granting 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6); Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(kcarr, 4)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
NORBERTO CAMPOS and NICOLASA
CAMPOS,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Plaintiffs,
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-2062
ORDER
Pending is Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing,
LLC's Motion to
Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 12(b) (6)
(Document No.3).
Plaintiffs have filed
no response to the motion, and it is deemed unopposed pursuant to
Local
Rule
7.4.
("Plaintiffs")
77469
("the
Plaintiffs
Norberto
and
reside at 6630 Boss Gaston Road,
Property,,).l
Defendant
Nicolasa
Richmond,
Plaintiffs'
insurer
issued
Plaintiffs and Ocwen for damages
Hurricane
1
Ike. 3
Plaintiffs
a
check
to the
allege
Texas
Ocwen Loan Servicing,
("Ocwen") is the servicer of Plaintiffs' mortgage loan. 2
2013,
Campos
that
payable
LLC
In April
jointly
to
Property sustained in
Ocwen
has
refused
Document No. 1-2, ex. A-3 at 4 of 16 (Orig. Pet.).
to
release
the
check to them. 4
Plaintiffs bring this suit for a
declaratory judgment that the full amount of the check belongs to
them, predicated on their claim that the original loan paperwork
did not correctly describe their lot, that is, that their hurricane
damaged house is situated on a smaller tract adjacent to the lot
described in the mortgage documents,
effectively created on the house. s
and therefore no lien was
Ocwen moves to dismiss on the
grounds of res judicata, arguing that this Court's Final Judgment
in Campos v. u.s. Bank Nat'l Ass'n. et al., Civ. A. No. 4:12-cv02236 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2013)
~")
(Ellison, J.)
(hereinafter "Campos
bars this action. 6
Res judicata "bars the litigation of claims that either have
been litigated or should have been raised in an earlier suit."
Test Masters Educ. Servs., Inc. v. Singh, 428 F.3d 559, 571 (5th
cir.
2005).
judicata,
For a
claim to be barred on the grounds of
four elements must be satisfied:
(1)
res
the parties are
identical to, or in privity with, those in a prior action;
(2) the
prior judgment was rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction;
(3) the prior action ended with a final judgment on the merits; and
(4)
the same claim or cause of action is involved in both cases.
The
Id.
Fifth Circuit uses a
4
Id.
S
Id. at 5 of 16.
6
transactional
Document No.3.
2
test to determine
whether both suits involve the same cause of action.
Id.
"[I]f
the primary right and duty and the delict or wrong are the same in
each action, the cause of action is the same."
and Inv. Co., 512 F.2d 481, 483
In December 2011,
Hall v. Tower Land
(5th Cir. 1975).
Plaintiffs filed suit against U.S.
National Association ("U.S. Bank"),
Bank
the mortgagee of Plaintiffs'
home loan,7 and Ocwen, asking the Court to "prevent any foreclosure
of liens as held by any assignee of the original Deed of Trust
above described until it is fully decided what property is covered
for the loan and what part the house is located on."8
U.S. Bank
and Ocwen filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
upon which relief
can be granted. 9
Judge
Ellison granted the
motion on November 13, 2012, but gave Plaintiffs leave to amend. 10
Plaintiffs did not amend, and the Court signed a Final Judgment on
March 1, 2013, dismissing the case with prejudice. 11
7 Document NO.3 at 2.
8 Campos I, Document No. 1- 9, ex. A- 8 .
The Court takes
judicial notice of the pleadings and judgments rendered in Campos
~.
See Jefferson v. Lead Indus. Ass'n, Inc., 106 F.3d 1245, 1250
n.14 (5th Cir. 1997) (the court may take judicial notice of matters
of public record, such as court documents, in considering a Rule
12 (b) (6) motion)
9
Campos I, Document NO.4.
10 Campos I,
Document No. 23; Campos v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n,
Civ. A. No. 4:12-cv-2236, 2012 WL 5828619 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2012)
(Ellison, J.).
11
Campos I, Document No. 26.
3
The first element of res judicata is met because Plaintiffs
and Ocwen are the opposing parties in both Campos I and the present
action.
The next two elements were met by reason of this Court,
which had diversity jurisdiction over the parties, entering a final
judgment on the merits. 12
See Hall,
512 F.2d at 483
("[G]ranting
defendant's motion to dismiss for plaintiff's failure to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted operates as an adjudication
on the merits
order
states
."); FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b)
otherwise,
a
adjudication on the merits.")
("Unless the dismissal
dismissal
operates
as
an
Finally, the fourth element is met
because the same claim underlies both actions, namely, that Ocwen
does not have a valid lien on Plaintiffs' house because the house
is
not
situated
within
the
contained in the mortgage. 13
bounds
In the
of
the
legal
former action,
description
Plaintiffs
contended that Ocwen did not have a valid lien due to the erroneous
legal description of the Property and, therefore, Ocwen could not
foreclose on the Property; and in the instant action,
Plaintiffs
again allege that Ocwen does not have a valid lien due to the
erroneous legal description of the Property, and therefore, Ocwen
is not entitled to the insurance proceeds as mortgagee.
While
12
See Campos I , Document No. 23 at 7 - 9 ( finding that the
parties were completely diverse and the amount in controversy was
over $75,000); Campos I, Document No. 26.
13
Campos I, Document No. 1-9, ex. A-8.
4
Plaintiffs
focus on entitlement to the insurance proceeds,
identical underlying claim,
valid lien on Plaintiffs'
namely,
home,
that Ocwen does not have a
is the controlling issue.
Maxwell v. u.s. Bank Nat'l Ass'n,
the
civ. A. No.
265975, at *6 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2013)
H-12-534,
(Johnson, Mag. J.)
See
2013 WL
(finding
suit barred by res judicata where, "[d]espite alleging an array of
causes
of
action
in
the
three
legal
actions,
Plaintiff
has
steadfastly challenged Defendants and others' rights to foreclose
on his mortgage and sell his real property.").
Masters, 428 F.3d at 571
See
also Test
("Under the transactional test, a prior
judgment's preclusive effect extends to all rights of the plaintiff
with respect to all or any part of the transaction, or series of
connected transactions, out of which the original action arose.").
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC's Motion to
Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of
civil Procedure 12(b) (6)
(Document No.3) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs
Norberto and Nicolasa Campos's claims are DISMISSED with PREJUDICE.
The Clerk will enter this Order, providing a correct copy to
all counsel of record.
SIGNED in Houston, Texas, this
~Y of
October 2013.
(
WERLEIN,
STATES DISTRICT J
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?