Ogle v. JT Miller,Inc
Filing
2
ORDER ADOPTING 1 Findings of fact and conclusions of law.(Signed by Judge Gray H. Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
ROBERT OGLE ,
Plaintiff,
v.
JT MILLER, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL CASE H-14-1816
ADVERSARY NO . 13-3031
ORDER
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9033, the Bankruptcy Court issued its
Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Memorandum Opinion on June 27, 2014,
after conducting a bifurcated trial on the fraudulent conveyances alleged to have been made from
HDD Rotary Sales, L.L.C. to Jay Miller and JT Miller, Inc. during 2009-2010. After hearing
testimony and admitting exhibits, the Bankruptcy Court found that the $193,167.00 obligation from
HDD Rotary Sales to Jay Miller originated as a bonus and was not an avoidable obligation.
Additionally, the Bankruptcy Court determined none of the transfers made by HDD Rotary Sales to
Jay Miller and JT Miller, Inc. were avoidable. Thus, the Bankruptcy Court recommended that the
district court grant judgment in favor of defendants.
Plaintiff has not filed for reconsideration or otherwise objected to the Bankruptcy Court’s
proposed findings. This court is required to conduct a de novo review of the proposed findings of
fact and conclusions of law issued by the Bankruptcy Court. Exec. Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison,
__ U.S. __, 134 S. Ct. 2165, 2170 (2014). This court has made a careful de novo review of the
Bankruptcy Court’s recommendation and finds that judgment should be entered in favor of
defendants. Therefore, the court adopts, in its entirety, the findings of fact and conclusions of law
proposed by the Bankruptcy Court (Dkt. 1) and finds that judgment should be entered in favor of
Jay Miller and JT Miller, Inc. A separate final judgment shall be issued in accordance with this
Order.
It is so ORDERED.
Signed at Houston, Texas on October 9, 2014.
___________________________________
Gray H. Miller
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?