Manley v. Texas Southern University et al
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS entered: The remaining claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim, but without prejudice and with leave to amend. Manley must file an amended complaint consistent with this order no later tha n February 13, 2015. The defendant will have until February 27, 2015 to file a preanswer motion to dismiss the amended complaint, if appropriate, and Manley may respond by March 20, 2015.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
STEPHEN MANLEY
Plaintiff,
v.
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-2749
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
On January 12, 2015, the court heard argument on Texas Southern University’s Motion to
Dismiss Stephen Manley’s Original Complaint, (Docket Entry No. 14). Based on the pleadings,
the motion, the response, and the applicable law, the court grants the motion for the reasons stated
in detail on the record.
Manley’s claims under the Equal Education Opportunities Act, the Americans with
Disabilities Act, and the Rehabilitation Act are dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend
because the complaint fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted and amendment would
be futile. The remaining claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim, but without prejudice and
with leave to amend. Manley must file an amended complaint consistent with this order no later
than February 13, 2015. The defendant will have until February 27, 2015 to file a preanswer motion
to dismiss the amended complaint, if appropriate, and Manley may respond by March 20, 2015.
SIGNED on January 15, 2015, at Houston, Texas.
______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?