Tow v. Powers et al

Filing 74

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 73 Memorandum and Recommendations. 67 MOTION for Summary Judgment is granted as to claims under 11 USC 542 and 549 and is denied as to claim for breach of fiduciary duty. ( Joint Pretrial Order and Motions in Limine due by 3/3/2017., Docket Call set for 3/10/2017 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake).(Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED February 15, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION RODNEY TOW , TRUSTEE, 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Plaintiff, WELLINGTON Defendant . David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO . H -14 -3103 ORD ER Having carefully considered the Magistrate Judge 's Memorandum and Recommendation dated January 30 , 2017, the court is of the opinion that the Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this court . It is, therefore , ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation is ADOPTED by this court . Defendant Wellington Yu's Motion for Summary Judgment ( Docket Entry No . 67) is GRANTED as to plaintiff's claims under 11 U . C. S. 55 542 and 549, and is DENIED as to plaintiff 's claim for breach of fiduciary duty . The 3 :00 parties on are March directed 2017, to appear Court for Docket Call at Room 9-B , 9L Floor , h United States Courthouse , 515 Rusk Avenue, Houston , Texas . Joint Pretrial Order and motions in The lim ine must be filed by March 3 , 2017 . Plaintiff is responsib le for the timely filing of the complete joint pretrial order. The court may address any pending motions and set the case for trial at Docket Call . SIGNED at Houston , Texas , on this 15th day of February , 2017 . * r SIM LAKE UN ITED STA TE S D ISTR ICT JU DGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?