KPI Bridge Oil Ltd. v. Lithuanian Shipping Company Ltd.
Filing
30
DEFAULT JUDGMENT entered against Lithuanian Shipping Company Ltd. in total amount $170,848.64; GRANTING 29 MOTION for Default Judgment against Lithuanian Shipping Company Ltd. Case terminated on 5/31/16.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
KPI BRIDGE OIL LTD.,
Plaintiff,
V.
LITHUANIAN SHIPPING CO. LTD.,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
June 01, 2016
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-15-1039
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST
LITHUANIAN SHIPPING CO., LTD.
Monjasa A/S (“Monjasa”) filed a Supplemental Admiralty Rule C Complaint against the
vessel M/V VENTA (“Vessel”), seeking damages in the amount of $136,411.96 plus interest from
the Vessel; her owner, the Lithuanian Shipping Company; and her charterer, the Oceanwide Services
GmbH (“Oceanwide”). Monjasa alleged that the Vessel failed to pay for 348 metric tons of bunker
fuel that Monjasa provided the Vessel in Karachi, Pakistan on or about February 17, 2015. The
Lithuanian Shipping Company retained counsel in May 2015. Counsel advised that the Lithuanian
Shipping Company was owned by the Lithuanian government and, as an agency or instrumentality
of a foreign state, was covered under Section 603(b) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
Monjasa released the Vessel from Rule C seizure but confirmed that it would prosecute its action
directly against the Company in personam under 28 U.S.C. § 1605 et seq.
The Lithuanian Shipping Company filed an appearance as the Vessel owner and filed an
answer to Monjasa’s complaint and counterclaim against Monjasa for wrongful arrest. On
February 25, 2016, the Company’s counsel filed an unopposed motion to withdraw as counsel of
record for the Company. The court granted the motion in February 2016, and entered an order
requiring new counsel to appear within 21 days. (Docket Entry No. 26). The Lithuanian Shipping
Company failed to appoint new counsel as ordered. Monjasa moved for entry of default, which the
court granted on May 3, 2016. (Docket Entry No. 28). Monjasa then moved for a default judgment
against the Company, with supporting documents, and notice to the Company. No response has
been filed. The damages sought are liquidated, and no further hearing is required.
Based on the pleadings, motions, and record, including the attachments to the motion for
default judgment, the following order is entered.
1.
Monjasa’s Motion for Default Judgment, (Docket Entry No. 29), against the
Lithuanian Shipping Company is granted.
2.
Default judgment is entered against Lithuanian Shipping Company in the principal
amount of $170,848.64. This includes prejudgment interest under Monjasa’s Bunker
Confirmation and Monjasa’s Group General Terms and Conditions 2012, and covers
the period from February 19, 2015 through May 12, 2016. This amount does not
include taxable costs of court, which are also awarded to Monjasa, or postjudgment
interest, which continues to accrue on the default judgment at the rate of 0.68% per
annum.
3.
Lithuanian Shipping Company’s Counterclaim against Monjasa, (Docket Entry No.
14), is dismissed with prejudice.
This is a Final Judgment.
SIGNED on May 31, 2016, at Houston, Texas.
______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?