Young v. Anderson

Filing 5

OPINION OF DISMISSAL. Young fails to state a claim recognized at law under Heck. This case will be dismissed. (Signed by Judge Lynn N. Hughes) Parties notified.(amwilliams, 4)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § JA VARROW YOUNG, HCJ 2426649, Plaintiff, versus DEVON ANDERSON. Defendant. CIVIL ACTION H-15-1052 Opinion on Dismissal Javarrow Young sues Harris County prosecutor Devon Anderson for civil rights violations. 42 U.S.c. § 1983. He moves to proceed as a pauper. 28U.S.C. § 1915. Young is held in the Harris County Jail under a charge of assaulting Ray Hopson. Ten days after he brought charges, Hopson told authorities he had lied. The charges were dropped. Later, he made a formal, written confession admitting that he had lied and signed papers to drop the charges. Young was nonetheless indicted on March 9, 2015. Hopson never went before a grand for his lies nor to give testimony which would exonerate Young and punish the accuser for filing a false police report. Young seeks dismissal of the charges and inj unctive relief because a "false police report" was filed against him. A civil rights claim for damages which challenges the validity of a conviction or custody cannot proceed unless the conviction or confinement has been held invalid. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U. S. 477,487 (1994). Heck applies to claims for injunctive relief that imply the invalidity ofa conviction or custody. Kutzner v. Montgomery County, 303 F.3d 339, 340-41 (5th Cir. 2002). Young's claims implicate the validity of his extended custody. There is no showing his confinement has been invalidated. The holdings in Heck and Kutzner bar Young's claims and his requests for relief. Young fails to state a claim recognized at law under Heck. This case will be dismissed. 8 Signed May _____ ,2015, at Houston, Texas . .~ _ I\A --------==~--~~~~~~==~------~ Lynn N. Hughes United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?