Foreman v. Colvin et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING 19 Memorandum and Recommendations, DENYING 13 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment , GRANTING 17 Opposed MOTION for Summary Judgment .(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Southern District of Texas ENTERED August 05, 2016 David J. Bradley, Clerk KIZZIE FOREMAN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION H-15-1961 ORDER Pending before the court is the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”) recommending that the court remand this case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further consideration consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s opinion. Dkt. 19. Neither party filed objections to the M&R. Having considered the M&R, related documents, and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that there is no clear error and that the M&R should be adopted and this case remanded to the Commissioner. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory Committee Notes (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). Accordingly, the M&R (Dkt. 19) is ADOPTED IN FULL. The court, consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, GRANTS summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Kizzie Foreman. The judgment of Commissioner is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further consideration in light of the reasoning set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Signed at Houston, Texas on August 5, 2016. ___________________________________ Gray H. Miller United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?