Malibu Media, LLC v. DOE
Filing
8
ORDER entered GRANTING 6 Ex Parte MOTION for DiscoveryEx Parte MOTION for Production of Documents.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOE, subscriber assigned
IP address 73.206.118.109,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
ENTERED
September 19, 2016
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-2345
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO SERVE THIRD-PARTY
SUBPOENA PRIOR TO RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE
In this copyright infringement case, Malibu Media, LLC has filed an ex parte motion for
leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Rule 26(f) conference.1 (Docket Entry No. 6).
Malibu Media seeks limited expedited discovery of an Internet Service Provider to obtain
identifying information of John Doe Defendant in this case. Based on the motion and the evidence,
the court finds the motion has merit and grants the request to serve the subpoena.
A showing of good cause is required for a plaintiff to obtain an order identifying the accounts
associated with Internet Protocol (IP) addresses. This requires “(1) a concrete showing of a prima
facie claim of actionable harm by the plaintiff; (2) specificity of the discovery request; (3) the
absence of alternative means to obtain the subpoenaed information; (4) a central need for the
subpoenaed information to advance the claim; and (5) [consideration of] the user’s expectation of
privacy.” Well Go USA, Inc., v. Unknown Participants, 2012 WL 4387420 at *1 (S.D. Tex. 2012)
(citing Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3, 604 F.3d 110, 114 (2d Cir. 2010)).
1
Rule 26(d)(1) states that “[a] party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties
have conferred as required by Rule 26(f)” unless the court orders otherwise.
1
Malibu Media’s complaint alleges that its investigator established a direct TCP/IP connection
with the defendant’s IP address through which one or more digital media files containing Malibu
Media’s copyrighted works were downloaded, infringing Malibu Media’s copyright. (Docket Entry
No. 1, Ex. 2). Malibu Media has only been able to identify the defendant by his or her IP address.
(Docket Entry No. 1). To proceed in this action, Malibu Media seeks issuance of a subpoena to
Comcast Cable, defendant’s Internet Service Provider, to provide information sufficient to identify
the defendant by name and address. Malibu Media has established that good cause exists for it to
serve a Rule 45 subpoena on Comcast Cable. See Davis v. Duncan Energy Partners L.P., 801
F.Supp.2d 589, 596 (S.D. Tex. 2011).
Malibu Media’s ex parte motion, (Docket Entry No. 6), is granted to the extent that:
(1)
In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45, Malibu Media may serve the
requested subpoena on Comcast Cable for the following information concerning the
defendant identified by the IP address 73.206.118.109: name and current address.
No telephone numbers are to be produced.
(2)
In addition to serving the subpoena, Malibu Media must serve Comcast Cable with
a copy of its motion, exhibits, and this order.
(3)
Comcast Cable must comply with the subpoena by serving the defendant with copies
of the subpoena and this order within 30 days after receiving the subpoena from
Malibu Media. Comcast Cable may use reasonable means of service, including
written notice sent to the last known address using either first-class mail or overnight
service.
(4)
Within 30 days after receiving a copy of the subpoena and this order, the defendant
may file any motion with this court to quash the subpoena or to proceed
2
anonymously. Comcast Cable may not turn over the defendant’s identifying
information to Malibu Media until this 30-day period expires. If the defendant files
a motion to quash or modify the subpoena, Comcast Cable may not turn over any
identifying information to Malibu Media until this court rules on the defendant’s
motion. If the defendant moves to quash or proceed anonymously, he or she must
immediately notify Comcast Cable so that Comcast Cable is on notice not to release
the defendant’s information until the court rules on such motions.
(5)
If the 30-day period lapses without the defendant contesting the subpoena, Comcast
Cable will have 14 days to produce the subpoenaed information to Malibu Media.
(6)
Malibu Media must serve the defendant with copies of all materials and information
obtained about him or her.
(7)
Any information disclosed to Malibu Media in response to the subpoena may be used
by Malibu Media solely for the purpose of protecting its rights as set forth in its
complaint.
(8)
Upon receipt of the subpoena, Comcast Cable must preserve all subpoenaed
information pending the resolution of any timely filed motion to quash.
(9)
Malibu Media must reimburse Comcast Cable for reasonable costs incurred in
producing the requested information if Comcast Cable provides Malibu Media with
a detailed invoice setting out the work performed.
SIGNED on September 19, 2016, at Houston, Texas.
______________________________________
Lee H. Rosenthal
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?