Alexander v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.

Filing 54

ORDER entered: This case is administratively stayed and closed without prejudice. The parties may move to reinstate the case to the active docket no later than 14 days after the Ross court rules on the pending motion for certification and settlement. Case terminated on 3/12/18(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TAMARA ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § March 12, 2018 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. H-16-3318 ORDER The court previously stayed this case pending a scheduled mediation on March 1, 2018 to try to reach a global settlement resolving this case and the related Colorado case, Ross v. Convergent Outsourcing. The parties submitted a joint status update informing the court of the outcome of that mediation. (Docket Entry No. 53). Although Ross and Convergent reached a settlement agreement, the intervenors, including the plaintiff in this case, declined to agree to the terms. Ross and Convergent intend to file a renewed motion for class certification and settlement in Colorado by May 29, 2018. The parties in this Texas case ask this court to continue the stay until fourteen days after the Ross court rules on the motion for approval of the settlement. This case is administratively stayed and closed without prejudice. The parties may move to reinstate the case to the active docket no later than 14 days after the Ross court rules on the pending motion for certification and settlement. SIGNED on March 12, 2018, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?