Singletary v. State Of Texas et al
ORDER ADOPTING 54 Memorandum and Recommendations re 51 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, 13 MOTION to Dismiss 11 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. , 50 MOTION to Consolidate Lead Case No. 4:16cv3476 and Membe r Case No. 4:17cv1764, 15 MOTION to Dismiss , 16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , 53 MOTION to Dismiss , 14 MOTION to Dismiss 11 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. , 17 Corrected MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CHARLESTON CLARK SINGLETARY,
STATE OF TEXAS, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION H-16-3476
Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”) entered by
Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson on October 30, 2017. Dkt. 54. The Magistrate Judge recommends
dismissing plaintiff Charleston Singletary’s claims (Dkt. 11) for want of jurisdiction. Id. Singletary
did not file any objections to the M&R. After reviewing the M&R, the various motions to dismiss,
and the applicable law, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Singletary’s claims should
be dismissed. The court finds no clear error on the face of the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b),
Advisory Comm. Note (1983). Accordingly, the M&R is ADOPTED IN FULL, and Singletary’s
claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court will enter a final judgment consistent
with this order.
Signed at Houston, Texas on November 16, 2017.
Gray H. Miller
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?