Cao v. BSI Financial Services, Inc. et al

Filing 106

ORDER ADOPTING 92 Memorandum and Recommendations DENYING 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment and 58 MOTION for summary judgment. (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
ANGELA CAO,
Plaintiff,
v.
BSI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

ENTERED
May 23, 2019
David J. Bradley, Clerk

CIVIL ACTION H-17-321

ORDER
Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”) in which the
Magistrate Judge recommends that the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment (Dkts. 52, 58)
be denied. Dkt. 92. No party filed objections to the M&R. After reviewing the M&R, related
documents, and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that there is no clear error and that the
M&R should be ADOPTED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory Committee Notes (“When no timely
objections is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the
record in order to accept the recommendation.”). Accordingly, the M&R (Dkt. 92) is ADOPTED
IN FULL. Defendants BSI Financial Services, Inc., Christiana Trust, a Division of Wilmington
Savings Fund Society, FSB, as trustee for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2012-10, and
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 52) and plaintiff Angela
Cao’s cross motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 58) are both DENIED.
Signed at Houston, Texas on May 23, 2019.

___________________________________
Gray H. Miller
Senior United States District Judge