Bank of America, N.A. v. McDade

Filing 15

ORDER entered: The initial conference in this case is scheduled for March 27, 2017 at 10:30 AM. The parties should come prepared to discuss whether this court has federal subject-matter jurisdiction.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, VS. TIMOTHY J MCDADE Defendant. § § § § § § § § § March 24, 2017 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. H-17-0406 ORDER The initial conference in this case is scheduled for March 27, 2017 at 10:30 AM. The parties should come prepared to discuss whether this court has federal subject-matter jurisdiction. The case management plan filed with the court states that the basis for federal subject-matter jurisdiction is the defendant’s federal-law counterclaim under the FDCPA. But in general, federal-law counterclaims are not a basis for removal. See Greene Home Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. Vogel, No. CA 3:98-CV-2966-R, 1999 WL 292718, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 12, 1999). There appears to be some possibility that a federal-law counterclaim in a completely preempted area of law could generate federal subject-matter jurisdiction, but it does not appear that the FDCPA completely preempts state law. Virgil v. Reorganized M.W. Co., 156 F. Supp. 2d 624, 630 (S.D. Miss. 2001). The parties should be prepared to address this potential jurisdictional issue at the initial conference. SIGNED on March 24, 2017, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?