Ren v. The University of Houston at Victoria et al.

Filing 19

ORDER ADOPTING 17 Memorandum and Recommendations, GRANTING IN PART DENYING IN PART 9 MOTION to Dismiss Partial.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION LUH YU REN, Plaintiff, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON AT VICTORIA, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § January 10, 2018 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION H-17-444 ORDER Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”) entered by Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson on December 26, 2017. Dkt. 17. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Dkt. 9. Ren responded. Dkt. 10. The Magistrate Judge recommends that defendants’ motion be granted in part and denied in part. Dkt. 17. Neither party filed any objections to the M&R. After reviewing the M&R, the motion, the response, and the applicable law, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that defendants’ motion should be granted in part and denied in part. The court finds no clear error on the face of the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Comm. Note (1983). Accordingly, the M&R is ADOPTED IN FULL, and defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Ren’s claims under the ADEA, ADA, and TCHRA (counts 2, 4–8, 10–12) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed at Houston, Texas on January 10, 2018. ___________________________________ Gray H. Miller United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?