Loomis-Price v. Lone Star College System

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING 19 Memorandum and Recommendations, DENYING 10 MOTION for Attorney Fees.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION LARRY LOOMIS-PRICE, Plaintiff, v. LONE STAR COLLEGE SYSTEM, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § January 10, 2018 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL ACTION H-17-766 ORDER Pending before the court is a memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”) entered by Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson on December 26, 2017. Dkt. 19. Defendant Lone Star College System filed a motion for attorneys’ fees. Dkt. 10. Plaintiff Larry Loomis-Price responded. Dkt. 14. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying Lone Star’s motion for attorneys’ fees. Dkt. 19. Lone Star did not file any objections to the M&R. After reviewing the M&R, the motion, the response, and the applicable law, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Lone Star’s motion (Dkt. 10) should be denied. The court finds no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2)(D) (motion for attorneys’s fees is referred to a magistrate judge under Rule 72(b); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Comm. Note (1983). Accordingly, the M&R is ADOPTED IN FULL, and Lone Star’s motion for attorneys’ fees is DENIED. Signed at Houston, Texas on January 10, 2018. ___________________________________ Gray H. Miller United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?