Warfield v. Unknown Party
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL entered. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. (Signed by Judge Vanessa D Gilmore) Parties notified. (wbostic, 4)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
May 02, 2017
David J. Bradley, Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
LARRY WARFIELD,
(FORMER SPN #00127161)
Plaintiff,
vs.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
JOHN DOE,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-17-1125
MEMORANDUM ON DISMISSAL
The plaintiff, a former inmate at the Harris County Jail, filed this civil rights action in forma
pauperis. On April21, 2017, the Clerk's Notice of Case Filing was returned to the court by the
postal service with the notation, "Return to Sender, released from custody ofHarris County Sheriffs
Office." (Docket Entry No.3).
Under Local Rule 83.4, a pro se litigant is responsible for keeping the Clerk advised in
writing of his current address. The court will send notices only to the address on file. The plaintiff
has failed to provide the court with an accurate, current address. Under the inherent powers
necessarily vested in a court to manage its own affairs, this court determines that dismissal for want
ofprosecution is appropriate. See FED. R. Crv. P. 41(b); Linkv. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626 (1962);
Woodson v. Surgitek, Inc., 57 F.3d 1406, 1417 (5th Cir. 1995); 8 J. MOORE ET AL., MOORE'S
0 \RAO\VDG\2ll 17117-1125 aOl.wpd
FEDERAL PRACTICE§
41.51 (3)(b) & (e) (3d ed. 201 0). Upon a proper showing, relieffrom this order
may be granted in accordance with FED. R. Crv. P. 60(b). See Link, 370 U.S. at 635.
This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution.
SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on
/d.04, 2---
,2017.
VANESSA D. GILMORE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
0 \RAO\VOG\2()J7\17-ll25 aOI wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?