Johnson v. U S Postal Service
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. Case terminated on 5/23/2017. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
R WAYNE JOHNSON,
U S POSTAL SERVICE,
May 23, 2017
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-1558
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
R. Wayne Johnson, an inmate incarcerated at the Clements Unit of the Texas Department
of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, has filed a civil rights complaint. Johnson
has not paid the filing fee. This action will be dismissed pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
Barring a show of imminent danger, under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, a
prisoner may not file an action without prepayment of the filing fee if he has, on three or more
prior occasions, filed a prisoner action in federal district court or an appeal in a federal court of
appeals which was dismissed as frivolous or malicious. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v.
Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385 (5th Cir. 1996). Johnson accumulated at least 14 such dismissals
before filing the pending complaint, and is no longer allowed to proceed in forma pauperis
pursuant to the provisions of section 1915(g). See, e.g., Johnson v. Texas Tech, No. 5:16-cv-276
(N.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2016); Johnson v. United States Marine Corps, No. 2:13-cv-66 (N.D. Tex.
July 15, 2013); Johnson v. Thaler, No. 2:10-cv-41 ( N.D. Tex. Feb. 27, 2012); Johnson v.
Thaler, No. 2:10-cv-006 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 6, 2011); Johnson v. Sloan, No. 2:09-cv-169 (N.D.
Tex. Oct, 26, 2009); Johnson and Gutierrez v. Livingston, No. 4:05-cv-2651 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 5,
2005); Johnson v. Dretke, No. 4:05-cv-1433 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 2005); Johnson v. Cockrell, No.
2:03-cv-170 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 17, 2003); Johnson v. McCaul, No. 3:03-cv-13 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 14,
2003); Johnson v. Whatley, No. 2:02-cv-107 (S.D. Tex. April 5, 2002). Johnson’s allegations do
not plead any facts showing that he is in any immediate danger which would warrant waiver of
the fee requirement. See Choyce v. Dominguez, 160 F.3d 1068, 1071 (5th Cir. 1998); Banos v.
O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884 (5th Cir. 1998).
In light of the pleadings and his litigation history, Johnson has failed to show that he is
eligible to proceed as a pauper and has also failed to assert a claim that has any legal basis.
Consequently, this action should be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e). This dismissal shall count as a strike under section 1915(g).
The court ORDERS that the Complaint (Docket Entry No. 1), filed by TDCJ-CID inmate
R. Wayne Johnson, TDCJ-CID No. 00282756 is DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); 28 U.S.C.
The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the
parties, to the TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel, P.O. Box 13084, Austin, Texas 78711, Fax
SIGNED on this 23rd day of May, 2017.
Kenneth M. Hoyt
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?