Tawe v. Gray et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED February 07, 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTH ERN D IST R ICT O F TEX A S HOUSTON D IVISION David J. Bradley, Clerk RICRARD N . TAWE, TDCJ #1596960, Plaintiff , CIVIL ACTION NO . H -17-3418 NORMA GRAY , et Defendants . M EMO NAHDUM OPIN ION AN D ORD ER The plaintiff, Richard N . Tawe ( TDCJ #1596960), has filed a Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint (ucomplaint' ( ') Docket Entry No. confinement the Texas under U .S .C . 1983 concerning the conditions of his Department of Correctional Institutions Division (% 'TDCJ' ') Crim inal Justice Because Tawe is an inmate who proceeds Xu forma pauperis, the court is required to scrutinize the claims and dismiss the Comp laint -- in whole or in part determines that the Complaint frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted' or useeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune ' from such relief.' 28 ' 55 1915( 2) e)( l915A ( b). After considering all of the pleadings, the court concludes that the Complaint must be dismissed for the reasons exp lained below . 1. Tawe is Huntsville x currently Backcround incarcerated He sues more than at the Ellis Unit in correctional officers and officials who were employed by TDCJ at the Ellis Unit facility , including : Officer Norma Bridges, Lieutenant Sonya J . Nesby ; Sergeant Zachary Officer Dustin E . Brishner ; Officer Sylvester Williford ; Gray ; Captain Curtis D . Glaze, Jr .; ( Officer Shana R. Gorman; ( Officer Lisa A . Hall; 7) 8) Officer Quentin Hall ; Officer John Shaundrick Bozeman; ( 11) Officer Tori A . Mullin; ( 12) Officer Meagan Talton ; Officer Smith ; Officer FNU Sm ith ; FNU Lopez; ( 16) Captain Michael A . Graham ; Spradlin; Officer Officer Kathleen E . Sergeant Emerald V . Brooks; ( 19) Officer Brenda J . Woodson; ( 20) Officer Cody B . Frazier; ( 21) Officer Okwonkwo A . Chikemg ; Officer Russell Bryd ; Officer Karilyn Natho; ( 24) Officer Darian A . Duffel; Illgen; ( 26) Officer Tommy Officer Heard ; Brittney Edwards; A. ( 32) Sergeant Benito Moya, Sergeant Luke Gorman; Warden Michael ( 31) Assistant ( 27) Officer Roesler ; Warden Charles Sam; Sergeant H. Landis; Lieutenant Richard E. Kembro; Fowler ; ( 36) Officer Matthew Faw; Sergeant Crystal W . Sergeant Brittney Edwards ; Officer Jacob Johnson ; Officer Alicia Scott; ( 39) Officer Kimberly Hatthorn; ( 40) Officer Lorena lcomp laint , Docket Entry No . - 2- p. Hernandez; ( 41) Officer William Hague; ( 42) Officer Andre Walker; Grievance Investigator Carrie Whatley ; Bendinez; ( 45) Archibald; Officer Kevan Smith; Officer Domingo ( 46) Officer Veronica Officer Emily Redden; ( 48) Officer Leslie Winslett; ( 49) Officer Carol Stanley ; ( 50) Grievance Investigator K. Brumble; and ( 51) Officer Jaqueline Caldaza. z Tawe's primary complaint is that he was subject to strip searches on several occasions, including : January lO, 2016; January 11, 2016; December September 20157 27, 2016, November 17 , 2016 ; November 24 , 2016 ; December 2, 2016 7 and May 2017 .3 Tawe contends that the searches v iolated his constitu - tional rights because female correctional officers were present in the vicinity and could see him naked . 4 Tawe also complains that the lead defendant , O fficer Norma Gray , improperly searched his cell and confiscated items of his personal property on January 26, 2016, in retaliation for a grievance that he had filed about the strip searches on January 25 , 2016 .5 Tawe seeks monetary damages from a11 of the defendants under 42 U .S .C . 5 1983 for the violation of his constitutional rights .6 2Id . at 5-15 . 3Id . at 16, 4Id . at 16, 18, 20 . 5Id . at 6Id = II. Discussion A prisoner inmate's right to privacy is nminimal, at best,' ' when juxtaposed with the legitimate security needs institution . See Oliver v. Scott, the F. 3d 736, 745 ( 5th Cir. 2002)7 see also Elliott v . Lvnn, 38 F. 3d l8, 190-91 ( 5th Cir. 1994). Thus, the Fifth Circuit has held that uE tqhe presence of female prison guards for security reasons on those occasions when male prisoners are naked is not a constitutional violation .' Pettv ' v . Johnson, 193 F . 518, 1999 WL 707860, at 3d ( 5th Cir. 1999) ( unpublished table op.) ( citing Letcher v . Turner, F. 508, 2d 510 ( 5th Cir. 1992)). The Fifth Circuit has also consistently held that the practice of conducting strip searches in the presence of female officers is not unconstitutional . See Oliver, 276 F .3d at 7477 Elliott , 38 F .3d at 190-92 ; Letcher , 968 F .2d at 5107 see also Johnson v. Rupert, 647 F. App ' 407, 408 ( x 5th Cir. 2016) ( per curiam); Tasbv v . Lvnauqh, App'x 615 ( 5th Cir. 2005); McKenzie v . Johnson, 204 F . 1115, 1999 WL 1328074, at *1 ( 3d 5th Cir. 1999) ( unpublished table op .). Therefore, Tawe's claim that he was improperly subjected to strip searches while female officers were present is frivolous . Tawe 's allegation that his personal property was wrongfully confiscated by Officer Gray also lacks merit . The Supreme Court has held that a negligent, or even intentional, deprivation of property by state officials that is random and unauthorized does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation or a cognizable claim under 42 U .S .C . 5 1983 if state 1aw provides an adequate post-deprivation remedy . See Hudson v . Palmer , 3194 , 3204 ( 1984); see also Parratt v . Taylor, 10l S. Ct. 1908, 1917 ( 1981), overruled in Dart on other grounds bv Daniels v . Williams, l06 S . Ct. 662 ( 1981). Texas provides a remedy for inmates whose property has been taken or destroyed in an unauthorized manner . See Myers v. Klevenhaqen, F.3d 91, ( 5th 1996)7 Marshall v . Norwood, 74l F.2d 761, 764 ( 5th Cir. 1984); Aquilar v . Chastain, 923 S . . 740, 743-44 ( . Crim . App . 1996)7 see also TEX. GOV' W 2d Tex T CODE 55 501 .007 , 501 .008 . Therefore , Tawe 's claim concerning his confiscated property has no basis in federal law and must be dismissed as legally frivolous . See Murphv v . Collins , 26 F .3d 541, 543-44 ( 5th Cir. 1994)7 see also Nelson v . Director, Texas Dep't of Crim . Justice, 124 F. App ' 897, 898 ( x 5th Cir. 2005) ( holding that 50th the civil rights lawsuit and appeal from dismissal of a prisoner's suit seeking compensatory damages for loss of personal property were ufrivolousr '). Tawe's allegation that Officer Gray confiscated his property nin retaliation' for filing a grievance , in which Tawe complained ' about being strip searched in front of female officers , also fails to state a valid claim . In that regard , claim s of retaliation by prison inmates umust be regarded with skepticism ,' which requires ' a reviewing court to ucarefully scrutinize' whether a prisoner has ' articu lated a sufficient retaliatory motive on the defendant's part. Woods v . Smith, 60 F . 1161, 1166 ( 3d 5th Cir . 1995) Tawe provides a copy of the grievance that reportedly instigated the search of his cell , but it makes no mention of Officer Gray or any possible motive for confiscating his property .? Tawe does not otherwise nallege a chronology of events from wh ich retaliation may plausibly be inferred.' Id. ( ' citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Jones v . Greninger, l88 F.3d 322, 325 ( 5th Cir. 1999). Because Tawe's bare allegations are insufficient to establish retaliation or any other actionab le claim , his Comp laint will be dismissed . 111 . Conclusion and Order Based on the foregoing , the court ORDERS that the Prisoner 's Civil Rights Complaint filed by Richard No . Tawe ( Docket Entry D ISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous . The Clerk is directed to prov ide a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the plaintiff . The Clerk will also provide a copy by regular mail, facsim ile the TDCJ transm ission , or e-mail to : Office of the General Counsel, P .O . Box 13084 , Austin , Texas 78711 , Fax Number 512-936-21597 and the Manager of the Three-strikes List for the Southern District of Texas . SIGNED at Houston , Texas, on this 7th day of F A ry , 2018 . S IM L AKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE R Grievance #2016081787, Docket Entry No. 1-2, pp .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?