Butler v. CIT Bank, N.A. et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 8 MEMORANDUM for Ruling on Defensive Motion to Dismiss In Spite of Automatic Stay. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JESSIE M. BUTLER,
CIT BANK, N.A., et al,
April 10, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:18-CV-268
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Before the Court is the defendant’s, CIT Bank, motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s, Jessie M.
Butler, suit [DE#s 3, 8].
The Court has reviewed the defendant’s motion and related
document(s) and, finding no response from the plaintiff, determines that the motion is
meritorious and should be granted.
The plaintiff entered into a home equity loan with the defendant on November 17, 2003.
Since that time, the plaintiff has failed to pay the Note according to its terms and the Note is in
default. In an effort to avoid foreclosure proceeding, the plaintiff filed suit against the defendant
asserting claims for deceptive trade practices, statutory fraud, common law fraud and breach of
The Court is of the opinion that the plaintiff’s claims, and in particular, the facts asserted
in his suit, fail to state a cognizable claim against the defendant beyond conclusory allegations.
See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); see also Oppenheimer v. Prudential Sec., Inc.,
94 F.3d 189, 194 (5th Cir. 1996).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 12 (b)(6) authorizes dismissal of a suit where a plaintiff
fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In the case at bar, even taking the
plaintiff’s allegations as true, and construing his allegations in the light most favorable to him,
his claim fails. Id. Therefore, the defendants’ motion should be and it is hereby Granted.
It is so Ordered.
SIGNED on this 10th day of April, 2018.
Kenneth M. Hoyt
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?